It uses real-world texture examples to decide how the image should look. The resizing can be batch processed to an entire folder of images, and the Resize module also enables batch printing. I've used ON1's Resize AI to increase the size of small images to more than double their original proportions. The detail in the enlarged images is incredibly fine. I find that with my super-sharp OM-1 photos, I must increase the smoothness slider to avoid unwanted artifacts.Īdjustment layers can be individually masked and blending modes applied. Different images can be layered too, of course. Some other programs, such as Affinity, copy the look of Photoshop. Many raw developers are similar to Lightroom. But ON1's UI is quite different from Adobe's. ![]() There are enough similarities in how it works to make the change from using one program to another easy. But, like any new program, some things take a little learning.īecause it combines a browser with a catalog, importing pictures into the program is unnecessary as you do with Lightroom. However, an advanced import method is available to bring images in from a memory card. That is accessible through the file menu there's not a big import button using up valuable UI space. Sometimes this is ok, other times, it’s very artificial looking.A small export button is located at the bottom right of the screen. What the most advanced of these AI tools are now doing, however, is beyond basic optics and math, as they are doing area by area object recognition and rebuilding the image based on reference objects. I find, for the lenses that DxO supports, it’s corrections look better than generic sharpening tools. Generic tools uniformly apply various algorithms independent of the lens. The benefit of DxO’s sharpening and detail enhancement is that it is specific for each lens based on in house lab measurements of the lens’s properties. (you could use a third party tool like Topaz sharpenAI or On1’s tool, but see later) it also handles chromatic aberrations in each color. In addition to the three of Lensfun, DxO improves sharpness and micro contrast which lensfun does not do at all. Most common is geometric distortion.ĭxO applies a much more sophisticated analysis, as I understand it, to lens corrections. Each lens can have one, two or three of these corrections, to find out which ones, check here: Lensfun's coverage. LensFun supports geometric distortion, total chromatic aberration and vignetting. ![]() ON1 Photo RAW 2022 uses the open-source LensFun database. ON1 currently does not support Nikon Z9 HE compression and released Z9 lossless compression (“normal compression”) later than DxO. NEW CAMERAS ADDED IN ON1 PHOTO RAW 2022.5 (16.9)Įnd excerpt. End excerpt.ĭoes anyone on this list have experience with LensFun? As it is crowd-sourced, I assume that there is little to no quality control, but rather post-use comments as to what does NOT properly work. This is a crowd-sourced, creative-commons database of lens profiles. However, ON1 seems to support more lenses than does DxO PL5E, and to allow these to be used with bodies for which DxO does not seem to allow. ON1 has new releases too often, using a great deal of “marketing hype”, and other reasons not to consider the application. ![]() ![]() Having used ON1 in the past, I switched to PL, currently PL5E, and have not looked back.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |